Most
animals instinctively understand that, to the extent that one's
territory is necessary to survival and reproduction, that territory
must be defended against encroachment by others that would threaten
one's survival. All resources are finite, and must not be
over-consumed. This is especially relevant to the human immigration
problem. Whereas immigration may be easily accommodated if
population density is low, and may even be beneficial, once a certain
population density is achieved, additional immigration becomes
detrimental.
Currently
the United States population density is a little under 100 persons
per square mile of land, including marshes, swamps, deserts, mountain
ridges and other unusable terrain. Although this translates to about
6-7 acres per U. S. resident, probably a quarter or so is unusable,
and the remainder must not only provide living space but also supply
food and other necessities and absorb the wastes. So far this
density has been tolerable, although consumption of water supplies
and other resources may be pushing critical limits.
The
world population density is somewhere around 140 per square mile, and
again this includes all mountains, deserts, and other unusable areas
except Antarctica, which we cede to the penguins. Thus we in the U.
S. are a little better off than most, but even increasing our density
to the world average would not make a dent in conditions elsewhere.
China and India, both large geographical areas, have densities in the
order of 1000 per square mile, and this in spite of unusable areas in
the Himalayas and the Gobi Desert. Again, we could double our
population density by absorbing 150 million from each of these two
countries, and not make a noticeable dent in the density of either.
And since the human population is currently increasing at a rate of
more than a quarter million per day, during the time that it
might take to move 300 million people to the U. S. the population of
the rest of the world could easily increase by more than the 300
million, and therefore nothing would be achieved except basically
destroying the U. S.
As
I discussed in my essay 'Population'(1), the growth rate of a
bisexual species is primarily a function of the female reproduction
success rate (the average number of successfully breeding females
each female produces), and depends much less on the number of males.
This presents an interesting conundrum with respect to war
philosophies. In the past, with adequate land and resources, the
objective of wars was to annex the opponent's land and resources,
including their breeding stock (females). This bluntly translated
into killing off or enslaving the males, but not killing the females.
One could then spread one's own genes by breeding the conquered
females. In this scenario, the invading army consisted solely of
male combatants.
The
problem facing Western Civilization in the 21st Century differs in
several respects. In addition to a horde of invading male
'combatants', e.g., the illegals, refugees, etc., that are pouring
into First World Western countries, part of the invading army
consists of immigrating women, children and complete immigrating
families. These members of the invading 'army' intend to win the war
of conquest by out reproducing the native population, and incredibly
the invaded countries are supporting their attempt to do so. Once
the resident 'army' is sufficiently large, the male combatants will
attempt to kill or enslave the native population.
The
moral of all this is that, unlike in previous wars, women and
children cannot be spared. If possible, they, along with the
invading male battalions, must be removed as soon as and as
completely as possible. Territorial borders must be defended from
any and all encroachment. Any residue of the resident 'army' must be
required to obey all laws and must NOT be supported to breed
(welfare) here or abroad. If this is not successfully implemented
immediately, Western Civilization is over, we will lose the 'war',
and will be the subjects/slaves of the occupying invaders. The only
alternative will be a no-holds-barred ethnic/race/religious
conflagration where all men, women and children will be fair game.
Humanity has achieved a 'critical mass', and avoiding a runaway
detonation may not even be possible. As an aside, Google 'too many
mice in a cage' and read the report entitled 'Behavioral Sink' by
John B. Calhoun on the experiments he ran from 1947 to 1973. It's a
little scary.
(1)
Musings and Rants, p. 173, Marcus Everett, CKCPC3 publishing, March
2016, RR1
Box 510. Nowata, Oklahoma 74048
(c)
Copyright 2016 by Marcus Everett, Wallback, WV
marcus.everett@citlink.net
